Biodiversity Back on Track in the BDT

There are a number of different species-prioritisation methods emerging around the world. The 'Back on Track' species prioritisation framework is based on Marsh et al.(2006) Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife. This method provides an opportunity for both scientists, the community and decision-makers (managers) to provide input, and can be applied across a range of taxonomic groups. There are four stages to the 'Back on Track' species prioritisation process:

Species assessments – where species native to Queensland are assessed by experts against multiple criteria. Species received a “number” using a metric applied by a panel of experts, which first takes into account the probability of extinction (max score 4), the consequences of extinction (which includes social values)(max score 12), and the potential for successful recovery (max score 12). This gives an unweighted score (max 28).

Criteria weighting – where criteria are weighted by senior decision-makers, to generate a score out of a maximum possible 400. The weighting for the species that we have received in our Regional list used the weighting agreed to from the EPA facilitated meeting held at the BDTNRM in September 2006.

Generating the species priority list - the scores generated in the first stage are then used to identify species as critical, very high, high, medium, or low priority (and to identify gaps for further research).and

State and NRM Regional workshops where NRM regional bodies undertake planning workshops using the results of 'Back on Track' as a starting point. Common threats to priority species are identified and management actions developed that will return the greatest conservation benefit from the resources invested.

Project update:

The BDTNRM is liaising with the EPA to develop the framework to ensure the incorporation of community values (including indigenous values) into the metric used to assess species.  A draft list of potentially high priority species for the region has been produced from the species assessment activities undertaken by EPA.

Key References

Marsh et al.(2006) Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife (Conservation Biology published online November 2006)

Description of the scores for all 'Back on Track' criteria, used to prioritise species in Queensland

Administration

Funding: to be determined

Contact: Bronwyn Houlden BDTNRM Programme Coordinator

email: Bronwyn.Houlden@bdtnrm.org.au

Project Identification Number: BD8014

Key Management Action: RCT BVH 2.1

BVH2.1.1 "By 2010, implement all existing threatened species recovery plans, develop recovery plans for remaining species in the recovery program."

Partners: EPA

Project Manager: Sara William, David Murphy

Links: For further information, see the EPA website for The 'Back on Track' method , A full explanation of the 'Back on Track' criteria , Taxonomic groups assessed to date and How 'Back on Track' is being applied .